With 30+ years of experience, our team handles high value, complex, and international arbitrations, working with businesses and individuals. Contact us today.

We use a range of alternative dispute resolution methods (ADR) to get the best results for our clients. One way is through arbitration. Other ADR methods include mediation, negotiation, adjudication and early neutral evaluation.

ADR helps us get the right outcome for commercial clients involved in risky legal disputes – without going to court. Commercial arbitration is the ADR process that most closely resembles court proceedings. Here are some situations when we might advise clients to engage in arbitration instead of litigation or some other kind of ADR:

  • When a contentious matter is particularly complicated
  • There’s an international element to the dispute
  • When the issues at stake are highly technical
  • The parties want to keep matters private, for example to avoid public reporting of commercially sensitive material

Get in touch with Nath Solicitors

Contact Nath Solicitors in London on 0203 983 8278 or contact the firm online.

We advise large, medium and smaller businesses on all aspects of commercial arbitration. We act for clients in London and across the UK as well as those based overseas who may wish to take advantage of arbitration carried out under the auspices of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) or similar arbitral institution.

What are the benefits of arbitration compared to litigation and other types of ADR?

Arbitrations take place before an independent third party or parties, (an arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators). They act like a judge, hearing arguments from both sides before reaching a decision. Part of the arbitrator’s role is to encourage collaboration between the parties and to discourage adversarial tactics.

Using arbitration as a way of resolving your commercial dispute won’t be appropriate in every case. For example, many internal shareholder disputes are best resolved through informal negotiation. Similarly disputes that concern issues of a less technical legal nature or where a high level of monetary compensation is not sought might be more efficiently resolved through mediation or another type of ADR.

In practice the expense and more formal setting of commercial arbitration compared to mediation or direct negotiations mean it’s really only appropriate when there is a considerable amount at stake – whether in terms of financial loss or in terms of damage to your commercial reputation. When it is used, commercial arbitration has a number of distinct benefits of arbitration. These include:

  • Flexibility – Parties have a high degree of control over the running of the arbitration
  • Choice of procedural rules – It’s up to both sides to agree the arbitration rules. This means parties can develop their own procedures from scratch (‘ad hoc arbitration’) or choose to follow the established rules of a recognised arbitral institution such as the LCIA, the International Chamber of Commerce (the ICC) or the International Bar Association (the IBA)
  • A binding decision– ADR methods like mediation don’t produce a binding decision but a commercial arbitration ‘award’ (decision) is not only binding but is also internationally recognised and enforceable across the globe
  • Privacy– Arbitration is a private process between the parties. This means avoiding damaging publicity and preventing the exposure of sensitive commercial data – always possible during a court case that’s held in public
  • An expert arbitrator– The arbitrator making the decision will possess a degree of expertise in the subject matter of your dispute that a judge won’t always have. This can drastically cut down the need for background explanations and the use of technical witnesses to clarify matters. (These are sometimes required for a judge sitting in court.) Parties to the arbitration get to choose the arbitrator so they can ensure the person making the decision is equipped with appropriate expertise
  • Limits on appeal– Arbitration awards are generally less open to appeal than court decisions. For many of our clients this is attractive because it ensures there is relatively swift closure of the dispute and certainty that the decision won’t be challenged
  • Neutrality – It’s up to the parties to agree where the arbitration itself will be heard, and to choose the arbitrator(s). If there is an international angle to the dispute – for example the parties are located in different countries – this means one party won’t be subject to the laws and procedures of a legal jurisdiction with which they may be unfamiliar

You can read more about the nature of arbitration on the Nath Solicitors Blog.

What does the arbitration process look like?

The way arbitrations proceed will vary from case to case. This contrasts with litigation where specific rules of court procedure will often apply uniformly. Arbitration allows parties to follow to a greater or lesser degree the rules of an institution like the LCIA, and to use the institution’s resources. Parties may also choose to arbitrate on an ad hoc basis where they make the rules themselves (usually with some reference to already established arbitral institutional frameworks).

Most arbitrations begun pursuant to an arbitration agreement (or arbitration clause in the relevant contract) will include some or all of the following steps:

  • A party, believing a dispute has arisen and wishing to arbitrate, sends a ‘notice to arbitrate‘ to the other party
  • Where an institution like the LCIA is involved the party sending the notice should comply with the institution’s requirements in terms of what details the notice should contain. It’s common practice at this point to nominate an arbitrator
  • The party in receipt of the notice should respond within the time specified in the notice and indicate whether it accepts the nominated arbitrator or whether it wants to nominate a different arbitrator
  • The arbitration panel is appointed. This may consist of a single arbitrator or a panel
  • Together the parties and the arbitrator(s) will isolate the key issues in dispute
  • The arbitrator, with input from both parties produces an arbitration timetable
  • The case proceeds in line with the agreed rules or the rules of the relevant arbitral institution
  • Key stages are similar to court proceedings, including preparation and exchange of written arguments, exchange of witness statements and disclosure of documents
  • A hearing is held. Usually solicitors and/or barristers will present each side’s case to the arbitration panel
  • The arbitrator(s) produce an award (a final decision)
  • A party, believing a dispute has arisen and wishing to arbitrate, sends a ‘notice to arbitrate ‘to the other party
  • Where an institution like the LCIA is involved the party sending the notice should comply with the institution’s requirements in terms of what details the notice should contain. It’s common practice at this point to nominate an arbitrator
  • The party in receipt of the notice should respond within the time specified in the notice and indicate whether it accepts the nominated arbitrator or whether it wants to nominate a different arbitrator
  • The arbitration panel is appointed. This may consist of a single arbitrator or a panel
  • Together the parties and the arbitrator(s) will isolate the key issues in dispute
  • The arbitrator, with input from both parties produces an arbitration timetable
  • The case proceeds in line with the agreed rules or the rules of the relevant arbitral institution
  • Key stages are similar to court proceedings, including preparation and exchange of written arguments, exchange of witness statements and disclosure of documents
  • A hearing is held. Usually solicitors and/or barristers will present each side’s case to the arbitration panel
  • The arbitrator(s) produce an award (a final decision)

View MoreLess

Why choose Nath Solicitors

Nath Solicitors is a commercial law firm situated in the heart of London. We handle arbitration cases for a range of small and medium-sized business in the UK and overseas. Our cases include ad hoc arbitrations as well as institutional arbitrations. Our offices are close to the central London LCIA offices and clients benefit from the relationships we have built up over the years, including a trusted network of barristers who specialise in LCIA and other institutional proceedings. We have also established good working relationships with key LCIA staff, including many of the specialist arbitrators. This enables us to provide an efficient and cost-effective commercial arbitration service no matter where you are in the world and irrespective of which legal system governs the commercial contract you are in dispute over.

Contact our arbitration and commercial dispute lawyers London

We advise businesses on all aspects of commercial arbitration under LCIA and other arbitral organisation rules. We can also assist companies in developing their own ad hoc arbitration procedures where appropriate.  Please contact Nath Solicitors on 0203 983 8278 or contact the firm online.

Contact Us

Get in touch with us using the form and one of our team will respond to you promptly. You can also contact us by email or telephone if you prefer.

enquiries@nathsolicitors.co.uk

020 3983 8278

Opening Hours

Mon – Fri 9am-5pm

    Personal Information

    More Information

    Please include the background to your situation and any further details that may help us answer your query.

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

    2025 2024 2023 2022 2021

    “Nath Solicitors are very approachable”

    Nath Solicitors have been providing us with legal consultation and advice, preparation of contracts, and assistance in resolving legal matters in relation to our domestic and international business since 2021.

    Nath Solicitors are very approachable and take the time to explore and understand all aspects of the business in relation to a specific legal matter, while maintaining professionalism throughout.

    We know our business is in safe hands with Nath Solicitors and would highly recommend them to any organisation, small or large, for their legal matters.

    Elaine Johnston, Aug 2025

    “Understanding, and always available”

    Honestly can’t thank Nath Solicitors enough, especially Shubha, for the help and support she gave throughout a very difficult time for my family. From the very beginning, Shubha was kind, understanding, and always available —she never once made us feel like just another case.

    Nellinka Nagyova, Jul 2025

    “Shubha’s legal expertise is exceptional”

    I feel incredibly fortunate to have been represented by Shubha Nath… Shubha’s legal expertise is exceptional, but it’s her humanity that truly sets her apart. I’m so grateful for everything she’s done and would gladly recommend her to anyone who needs real support.

    PS, Jun 2025

    “I can’t thank Shubha enough”

    I can’t thank Shubha enough for her prompt, wise counsel after taking the time to read through a comprehensive brief and ultimately steering me away from a protracted, expensive and potentially fruitless court battle and down a far more effective route. Thank you for your help and your time Shubha.

    Charles Riches, Feb 2025

    “Her professionalism truly stood out”

    Shubha helped me with a very urgent question regarding a work contract. Not only did she respond to my initial inquiry very rapidly, which was crucial in the situation but she was also able to analyze the matter at hand and kind enough to provide me with legal help within a very short amount of time.

    M W, Jan 2025

    “The team are highly skilled”

    Shubha and her team supported us through a harassment case. The team are highly skilled, kind and professional. Thank you!

    Jane Kenchington, Dec 2024

    “A quick and trustworthy solution”

    Thank you so much to Nath Solicitors for their assistance. They were very helpful, accurate, and efficient in resolving an issue I had. I highly recommend Nath Solicitors, and a big thank you to Shubha Nath for finding a quick and trustworthy solution in a tricky situation.

    Xavier Vollin, Nov 2024

    Client
    Successes

    A selection of examples of our work and how we have successfully helped our clients.

    The Scenario

    Our client had experienced an increase in false and defamatory fake reviews on their Google My Business page. The material caused significant distress to our client and had the potential to damage their reputation.

    Our Solution

    We wrote to Google explaining that the reviews were fake and left by a competitor to diminish our client’s five-star ratings from genuine clients and asked for the fake and defamatory reviews to be removed. With our quick response, we were able to minimise the amount of distress and commercial damage our client was suffering.

    The Scenario

    Our client is one of the UK’s leading celebrity dentists. An otherwise happy patient of our client filed a complaint against them with General Dental Council (the GDC). Several false and highly defamatory reviews appeared on our client’s Google page and Trustpilot profile under false names.

    Our Solution

    We wrote a detailed letter before claim to the defendant and explained how her reviews were false, malicious, and defamatory and could cause serious financial harm to our client's business. We explained that our client would hold the defendant liable should legal action be taken. Following receipt of our letter, the defendant deleted all the reviews under each fake name.

    The Scenario

    Our client (the claimant in the case) had been at school with the defendant. Our client was being defamed by the defendant on social media (Instagram and Snapchat). The defendant had also caused videos of our client to be circulated online. The untrue allegations were of the most serious nature, including the allegation that our client was a rapist and a paedophile.

    Our Solution

    Following a carefully worded letter from us pointing out the serious legal repercussions to the defendant of publishing the material, all posts were removed, and the defendant agreed never to repeat the harmful allegations.

    The Scenario

    Our client had been in an online relationship with the defendant for four years, whom they had only met once in person. When our client ended the relationship, the defendant threatened to disclose their relationship to our client’s wife and also harass them.

    Our Solution

    This case involved sensitive legal issues of private information and misuse of private information and revenge porn. With our careful and sensitive handling the matter was resolved between the parties and the defendant was persuaded to delete all images.

    The Scenario

    Our client is a popular YouTuber with over 9 million views and 23,000 subscribers. We defended him against a claim brought by a participant in her new YouTube show (the Claimant). While the show was being recorded, the Claimant and our client disagreed on several points. With recordings of the heated disagreements being published online, the Claimant then wrote a letter before action to our client accusing her of harassment and defamation.

    Our Solution

    We wrote to the Claimant’s solicitor debunking their letter before action which in turn resolved the matter. We explained our client’s position, stating that the Claimant knew the type of content created on the client’s channel before joining the show, that the Claimant knew that that the show would be streamed live, and that proof of harassment and serious harm would need to be shown to have occurred.

    The Scenario

    Nath Solicitors assisted an online fashion designer retailer facing defamation from a business competitor on Instagram. The competitor had made false and damaging statements about the authenticity of the retailer’s products, leading to doubts among existing customers and potential business partners.

    Our Solution

    Nath Solicitors stepped in and provided evidence of the products’ authenticity to counter the false claims. We also initiated communication with the anonymous competitor and issued a cease and desist letter. This approach led to the removal of the defamatory posts and an apology.

    The Scenario

    A professional investor had invested in a company managed by the defendant. When the investor sought to redeem their investment, their relationship with the defendant deteriorated, and the defendant created a defamatory website making baseless accusations against the investor, including claims of criminal activity and fraud.

    Our Solution

    Nath Solicitors issued a detailed letter before claim, emphasizing the defamatory nature of the allegations and the harm caused to the investor’s reputation. While the defendant initially resisted, legal proceedings were initiated. Eventually, a settlement agreement was reached, which included the removal of the defamatory website

    The Scenario

    Anonymous threats were being sent to a building company and the claimants. The defendant threatened to publish false and defamatory statements in local newspapers, accusing the building company of being “bogus builders” and warning people against using their services.

    Our Solution

    Given the malicious nature of these threats, Nath Solicitors successfully wrote to the defendant to address the issue. This intervention prevented the publication of damaging statements, especially considering the underlying litigation between the claimants and the defendant.

    The Scenario

    The defendant, a former customer of a hospitality management company, initiated a campaign of defamation, making false claims and encouraging others to do the same after requesting a refund for a booking made with the company before it went into liquidation.

    Our Solution

    Nath Solicitors intervened, issuing a letter to address the false allegations. The result was the removal of defamatory posts and the cessation of the defendant’s harmful conduct.

    The Scenario

    Nath Solicitors represented a professional and a company that had been targeted with false and defamatory reviews on their Google Review page, alleging a lack of professionalism, poor-quality services, and negligence regarding inheritance matters in Poland.

    Our Solution

    Nath Solicitors successfully dealt with this unpleasant situation and had the defamatory content removed.

    The Scenario

    A church’s reputation was under relentless attack from the defendant on social media. The defendant made false allegations on platforms like Facebook and a website, including claims of being a cult, theft, and controlling behaviour.

    Our Solution

    Nath Solicitors intervened, demanding the defendant cease these actions and seek undertakings to prevent legal action. The harassment was successfully stopped through legal intervention.

    The Scenario

    A reputable aesthetic clinic and its aesthetics doctor, faced defamation following a client’s appointment. The client posted a highly defamatory review, alleging negligence and improper conduct related to COVID-19 safety measures.

    Our Solution

    Nath Solicitors responded by refuting the allegations and citing legal precedent. They sought remedies, leading to the removal of the review and an apology, protecting the clinic’s reputation.

    The Scenario

    A reputable diamond art company was facing defamation and harassment from a former customer. The customer engaged in a campaign of defamation on social media platforms, including Facebook and YouTube, causing significant distress and harm to the company’s reputation.

    Our Solution

    Nath Solicitors intervened, and the defendant agreed to resolve the matter by deleting defamatory content and removing a private Facebook group created to harm the company’s reputation.

    The Scenario

    Our client a supplier of ODM mobile telephones and accessories asked us to help him negotiate his agency agreement with a large Chinese supplier. The products were to be supplied to a large network operator who was the largest in the country.

    Our Solution

    We assisted our client in negotiating the terms of the agreement with the Chinese supplier and in particular advised in respect of what would happen if the agreement were to be terminated and the impact of the Commercial Agent’s Regulations in protecting our clients long terms interests.

    The Scenario

    Our client, a large multinational, looked to implement agreements with its other group companies in particular to transfer data outside of the EU.

    Our Solution

    We worked with lawyers and local regulators in various countries in order to ensure relevant data protection filings were made at local level. The completion of the project was when the data transfer agreements with the parent company outside of the EU had been entered into in order to allow transfer of data out of the EU.

    The Scenario

    The Defendant had received aesthetic treatments from our client, an aesthetic clinic, and dissatisfaction arose when the Claimant experienced common side effects after undergoing procedures. The clinic provided thorough consultations, signed consent forms, and clear aftercare instructions. Despite this, the Defendant initiated discussions about obtaining a refund. The Defendant’s conduct included recording a conversation without consent and making threatening emails.

    Our Solution

    We were engaged to write to the Defendant and in the end, we managed to obtain resolution between the parties which was a successful outcome for both sides.

    The Scenario

    A GP Practice received a letter from solicitors asking for disclosure of a deceased patient’s records as part of the administration of the deceased’s estate. The solicitors had sent a copy of the grant of probate from the High Court to our client. The Practice was unsure if the records could in fact be disclosed.

    Our Solution

    We reviewed the matter and advised in respect of the Practice’s obligations of confidentiality and data protection towards other living individuals who could have been identified through the medical records. We also advised the Practice manager that that the grant of probate was invalid in that it did not bear the seal of the court and she could therefore refuse the request on that basis in addition to the grounds of confidentiality and data protection.

    The Scenario

    We were instructed by one of the two joint shareholders in a company to resolve a shareholders dispute. The company had been set up by two friends to produce and market food products. There was no shareholder agreement in place although it was accepted that each party held 50% of the shares.

    Our Solution

    After advising our client, they made an offer to take over outstanding loans of the company and to repay the other shareholder a further loan she had made to the company from the distributable profits of the company over the next few years. In return the other shareholder was to enter into a share transfer agreement and sign a stock transfer form for transfer of her shares to our client.

    The Scenario

    Two professionals set up a company with no shareholder agreement. After a time, our client decided to dedicate her full time to the business and wanted to exercise more management and financial control as the other shareholder became unhappy. Our client realised that the business she was qualified to run and which she had set up was no longer in her control.

    Our Solution

    We advised our client as to the best way to proceed to resolve the shareholders dispute. In the end, the co shareholder chose to offer their letter of resignation which we advised could occur; our client was not at all surprised by the resignation because she said we had “prepared her well to expect it”. Ultimately the matter was resolved to our client’s great satisfaction.

    The Scenario

    We were asked by a client to help put in place an Information Governance Framework across their Group companies. We started by carrying out data audits of the companies concerned.

    Our Solution

    Once the results of the audits had been analysed (which involved checking the client’s key commercial contracts) we were able to determine the gaps across the organisation and its subsidiaries in order to implement policies and procedures to demonstrate compliance with data protection laws.

    FAQs

    If your question isn’t answered here or you would like our advice on your legal matter, please contact us.

    Enquire Now020 8138 9373

    Is arbitration cheaper than going to court?


    Will I be liable for costs if I win/lose?


    Can I insist on arbitration to settle a dispute?


    When can I decide to arbitrate?


    Need legal help? Contact us today — we can help you.

    Enquire Now020 3983 8278

    Related
    Services

    Enquire Now