With 30+ years of experience, our team handles high value, complex, and international arbitrations, working with businesses and individuals. Contact us today.
We use a range of alternative dispute resolution methods (ADR) to get the best results for our clients. One way is through arbitration. Other ADR methods include mediation, negotiation, adjudication and early neutral evaluation.
ADR helps us get the right outcome for commercial clients involved in risky legal disputes – without going to court. Commercial arbitration is the ADR process that most closely resembles court proceedings. Here are some situations when we might advise clients to engage in arbitration instead of litigation or some other kind of ADR:
- When a contentious matter is particularly complicated
- There’s an international element to the dispute
- When the issues at stake are highly technical
- The parties want to keep matters private, for example to avoid public reporting of commercially sensitive material
Get in touch with Nath Solicitors
Contact Nath Solicitors in London on 0203 983 8278 or contact the firm online.
We advise large, medium and smaller businesses on all aspects of commercial arbitration. We act for clients in London and across the UK as well as those based overseas who may wish to take advantage of arbitration carried out under the auspices of the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) or similar arbitral institution.
What are the benefits of arbitration compared to litigation and other types of ADR?
Arbitrations take place before an independent third party or parties, (an arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators). They act like a judge, hearing arguments from both sides before reaching a decision. Part of the arbitrator’s role is to encourage collaboration between the parties and to discourage adversarial tactics.
Using arbitration as a way of resolving your commercial dispute won’t be appropriate in every case. For example, many internal shareholder disputes are best resolved through informal negotiation. Similarly disputes that concern issues of a less technical legal nature or where a high level of monetary compensation is not sought might be more efficiently resolved through mediation or another type of ADR.
In practice the expense and more formal setting of commercial arbitration compared to mediation or direct negotiations mean it’s really only appropriate when there is a considerable amount at stake – whether in terms of financial loss or in terms of damage to your commercial reputation. When it is used, commercial arbitration has a number of distinct benefits of arbitration. These include:
- Flexibility – Parties have a high degree of control over the running of the arbitration
- Choice of procedural rules – It’s up to both sides to agree the arbitration rules. This means parties can develop their own procedures from scratch (‘ad hoc arbitration’) or choose to follow the established rules of a recognised arbitral institution such as the LCIA, the International Chamber of Commerce (the ICC) or the International Bar Association (the IBA)
- A binding decision– ADR methods like mediation don’t produce a binding decision but a commercial arbitration ‘award’ (decision) is not only binding but is also internationally recognised and enforceable across the globe
- Privacy– Arbitration is a private process between the parties. This means avoiding damaging publicity and preventing the exposure of sensitive commercial data – always possible during a court case that’s held in public
- An expert arbitrator– The arbitrator making the decision will possess a degree of expertise in the subject matter of your dispute that a judge won’t always have. This can drastically cut down the need for background explanations and the use of technical witnesses to clarify matters. (These are sometimes required for a judge sitting in court.) Parties to the arbitration get to choose the arbitrator so they can ensure the person making the decision is equipped with appropriate expertise
- Limits on appeal– Arbitration awards are generally less open to appeal than court decisions. For many of our clients this is attractive because it ensures there is relatively swift closure of the dispute and certainty that the decision won’t be challenged
- Neutrality – It’s up to the parties to agree where the arbitration itself will be heard, and to choose the arbitrator(s). If there is an international angle to the dispute – for example the parties are located in different countries – this means one party won’t be subject to the laws and procedures of a legal jurisdiction with which they may be unfamiliar
You can read more about the nature of arbitration on the Nath Solicitors Blog.
What does the arbitration process look like?
The way arbitrations proceed will vary from case to case. This contrasts with litigation where specific rules of court procedure will often apply uniformly. Arbitration allows parties to follow to a greater or lesser degree the rules of an institution like the LCIA, and to use the institution’s resources. Parties may also choose to arbitrate on an ad hoc basis where they make the rules themselves (usually with some reference to already established arbitral institutional frameworks).
Most arbitrations begun pursuant to an arbitration agreement (or arbitration clause in the relevant contract) will include some or all of the following steps:
- A party, believing a dispute has arisen and wishing to arbitrate, sends a ‘notice to arbitrate‘ to the other party
- Where an institution like the LCIA is involved the party sending the notice should comply with the institution’s requirements in terms of what details the notice should contain. It’s common practice at this point to nominate an arbitrator
- The party in receipt of the notice should respond within the time specified in the notice and indicate whether it accepts the nominated arbitrator or whether it wants to nominate a different arbitrator
- The arbitration panel is appointed. This may consist of a single arbitrator or a panel
- Together the parties and the arbitrator(s) will isolate the key issues in dispute
- The arbitrator, with input from both parties produces an arbitration timetable
- The case proceeds in line with the agreed rules or the rules of the relevant arbitral institution
- Key stages are similar to court proceedings, including preparation and exchange of written arguments, exchange of witness statements and disclosure of documents
- A hearing is held. Usually solicitors and/or barristers will present each side’s case to the arbitration panel
- The arbitrator(s) produce an award (a final decision)
- A party, believing a dispute has arisen and wishing to arbitrate, sends a ‘notice to arbitrate ‘to the other party
Why choose Nath Solicitors
Nath Solicitors is a commercial law firm situated in the heart of London. We handle arbitration cases for a range of small and medium-sized business in the UK and overseas. Our cases include ad hoc arbitrations as well as institutional arbitrations. Our offices are close to the central London LCIA offices and clients benefit from the relationships we have built up over the years, including a trusted network of barristers who specialise in LCIA and other institutional proceedings. We have also established good working relationships with key LCIA staff, including many of the specialist arbitrators. This enables us to provide an efficient and cost-effective commercial arbitration service no matter where you are in the world and irrespective of which legal system governs the commercial contract you are in dispute over.
Contact our arbitration and commercial dispute lawyers London
We advise businesses on all aspects of commercial arbitration under LCIA and other arbitral organisation rules. We can also assist companies in developing their own ad hoc arbitration procedures where appropriate. Please contact Nath Solicitors on 0203 983 8278 or contact the firm online.