Civil contempt: disobeying a court order

Civil proceedings contempt can come in different forms, including but not limited to:

• Breaching an injunction, such as non-disclosure or freezing orders
• Failure to comply with mandatory directions from the court
• Breaching an undertaking to the court

False statement verified by a statement of truth

This can occur when someone signs a legal document, stating it is true but knowingly including false information.  The consequences may include fines or imprisonment of up to two years. For example, false claims about personal injury in a statement of truth led to a 6-month sentence in North Bristol NHS Trust v White.[1]

Contempt in the face of the court

When a person exhibits disruptive conduct in a courtroom that hinders the ongoing proceedings, such as:

• Shouting or demonstration of other disrespectful behaviour
• Threatening other individuals in the courtroom
• Refusing to answer questions
• Interfering with witnesses

This is a form of criminal contempt that can amount to a term of imprisonment for up to two years, fines, or both.

Submitting a contempt application

Before a claimant can bring a contempt application under CPR 81.3 for interfering with the administration of justice (excluding High Court or County Court proceedings) or knowingly making a false statement of truth, they must first obtain the permission of the court.

Alternatively, the undertakings for a contempt application need to be precise about the specific contemptuous action, with these clearly outlined and supported by factual evidence. A detailed witness statement or affidavit may be needed with recorded proof (e.g., emails, messaging, digital logs) to support the claim.

Strict compliance with procedural requirements is expected from the court because it is an application intending to impose serious penalties or to commit someone to serving time in prison. Such serious repercussions mean these applications must be made appropriately and considered seriously by the court.

At Nath Solicitors we provide legal expert advice on disputes. If you need assistance, please call us on 0203 983 8278 or email us at enquiries@nathsolicitors.co.uk.

[1] [2022] EWHC 1313 (QB).

The post Contempt Of Court – Grounds And Applications appeared first on Defamation & Commercial Litigation Lawyers London | Nath Solicitors.

Legitimate reasons for exclusion

When disputes involve a director, a dedicated conflicts committee, free from the director’s influence, may be established to control the flow of privileged information and advice. However, careful steps must be taken to structure, document and minute the meetings to avoid any grounds for an unfair prejudice claim.

Scenarios may arise where a director has, in their personal capacity, interest in proposed agreements or deals the company is considering taking on. In the event of a conflict, a director must declare the interest as soon as possible, and usually they will be barred from voting and will not count toward quorum (the minimum number of members needed for a meeting to be valid). Authorisation of resolutions in the event of a director’s conflict of interest will only be valid if they do not participate in the substantive decision-making process. However, there are circumstances where they may still be allowed to attend for discussion.

Attendance can sometimes also be restricted for confidentiality. However, sometimes the directors still need certain pieces of information from the meetings to execute their duties. In these scenarios, short summaries leaving out confidential information should be provided for the director’s reference with recorded reasons, and limiting the agenda of the meeting to the specific item that cannot be disclosed. This gives the director access to as much information as possible outside of the meeting.

Risk reduction in excluding a director from a meeting

The first step before making any decisions should always be to check the company’s articles of association or shareholders agreement for any provisions on participation rights. Any procedures made in relation to a meeting excluding a director should be done clearly and unequivocally, with legitimate reasons given for the exclusion (e.g., conflict management, protecting privilege). However, to avoid potential shareholder disputes under s.994 of the Act, directors should typically not be excluded from meetings.

To contact Nath Solicitors, please call us on 0203 983 8278 or email us at enquiries@nathsolicitors.co.uk.

The post Exclusion Of A Director From A Meeting appeared first on Defamation & Commercial Litigation Lawyers London | Nath Solicitors.

Advantages of ECA

A main advantage of an ECA is that it provides clarity on the case’s prospect of success. This process provides a disciplined review of the legal basis of a claim or defence and any limitation issues, the remedies sought, and the likely approach of the court. It reveals flaws in arguments or identifies areas needing more proof before a stance can be accepted.

ECAs are valuable for evidence and document strategy. Early analysis can identify relevant documents, potential witnesses, and risks around disclosure. This reduces the likelihood of surprises later and focuses time towards collating streamlined material rather than producing large volumes of irrelevant evidence.

Another major advantage is cost and risk management. Litigation is about proportionality and risk and an ECA can provide clear budgeting, highlight cost exposure if the case is lost, and identify procedural milestones that drive spending. It can also help evaluate funding options, insurance cover, and whether alternative routes such as mediation and settlement discussions are likely to achieve a better outcome at lower cost.

Furthermore, ECAs improve settlement leverage. A party with a clear understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, and valuation of their case is better placed to make credible settlement proposals, avoiding positional bargaining. An ECA can also shape a letter before action or prepare for ADR from a position of confidence. However, the ECA can only be effective as the information provided. If documents are missing and facts are still developing, any assessment must be expressed with sensible assumptions.

Overall, early case assessments are generally beneficial because it helps clients make informed choices regarding litigation, settlement, mediation, and narrows the issues in dispute before costs escalate.

At Nath Solicitors, we provide expert advice on litigation. If you need assistance. Please call us today on 0203 983 8278 or email us at enquiries@nathsolicitors.co.uk.

The post Are Early Case Assessments Beneficial In Litigation appeared first on Defamation & Commercial Litigation Lawyers London | Nath Solicitors.

At the outset, the contract between the parties should clearly specify their chosen dispute resolution process. Any disputes will be handled through this method and in the forum specified by the dispute resolution clause, whether that is a national court or arbitration. Advance arbitration agreements can pre-empt jurisdictional challenges and reduce associated costs.

When handling cross-border disputes, you must determine whether the court will decide the dispute by applying English law or foreign law. The parties can specify the applicable law in a contract’s governing law clause, or a court will decide it based on a particular legal system.

If the governing law is foreign, parties should consider how that foreign law will operate within English court proceedings, including on interim applications such as jurisdiction challenges. A party relying on foreign law must plead it and prove it in evidence. Even where English law applies, foreign rules can still affect parts of the process, for example, disclosure of evidence held abroad. Limitation periods must also be reviewed, as they may differ under English law and the relevant foreign law.

Your choice of jurisdiction is significant because it could prevent you from pursuing your case in the location you want. Even where a contract specifies England, the other party may still challenge the English court’s jurisdiction, or connected claims may be issued elsewhere. Taking advice early helps you assess the risk of parallel proceedings and the practical and cost implications of having to litigate in a foreign court.

Service is often the next hurdle. Serving court papers on a defendant outside England and Wales must comply with specific procedural rules and, in many cases, the requirements of the country where service takes place. Some jurisdictions require formal service through local authorities, while others allow faster methods. Mistakes can cause significant delays and added costs and may prompt applications to set aside service. For that reason, the method of service, the accuracy of the address details, and clear evidence that service was properly performed all need careful attention.

Enforcement is where strategy meets reality; a judgment is only valuable if it can be turned into recovery. Before committing significant time and cost to litigation, it is sensible to identify where the debtor’s assets are located such as bank accounts, receivables, stock, property, or any available guarantees.

The ease of enforcing a UK judgment varies from country to country and may depend on local law, applicable treaties and the terms of your dispute resolution clause including whether you have an exclusive jurisdiction agreement or an arbitration award. Arbitration is often preferred in cross-border contracts because arbitral awards can be enforced in many jurisdictions worldwide.

Nath Solicitors are a leading boutique law firm with over 30 years’ legal experience. We provide structured advice on commercial disputes. If you need assistance, please call us today on 0203 983 8278 or email us at enquiries@nathsolicitors.co.uk.

The post Cross-Border Commercial Disputes: What UK Businesses Should Know appeared first on Defamation & Commercial Litigation Lawyers London | Nath Solicitors.

The agreement should clearly define the scope of the broker’s service. An appointment and authority clause specifies what the broker is authorised to do, such as introductions, marketing the principal or client’s products or services, or supporting negotiations.  Critically, the contract should state whether the broker has authority to bind the principal. In most cases, brokers are appointed as independent contractors with no authority to enter into agreements on the principal’s behalf. Clear drafting reduces the risk of unintended agency or misrepresentation claims.

A Scope, territory, and exclusivity clause is vital. This clause should outline the broker’s permitted market or territory. It should also specify if the broker has exclusive rights, potentially earning commission even if the principal closes the deal independently. Alternatively, it should clarify if the principal can engage with multiple brokers, with commission only paid to the one who finalises the transaction.

A commission, fees, and payment terms clause is  also required. Remuneration provisions should set out whether the commission rate is a fixed fee, percentage of the final sale, or a retainer. The clause should also clarify when commission is earned and when it is payable, and  include the procedure for invoicing and VAT, how variations will be handled, and what happens in situations requiring cancellations, refunds, and non-payment.

A compliance clause helps ensure that applicable laws and standards are followed, including marketing standards, anti-bribery requirements, anti-money laundering, and financial services obligations. The broker should guarantee that they hold necessary permissions, maintain proper records, and cooperate with audits.

Confidentiality and data protection provisions should protect sensitive information such as pricing, client information, and commercial terms. Data protection clauses address controller and processor status, lawful basis, security measures, breach notification, and retention requirements. This clause is particularly relevant where brokers handle personal and commercially sensitive data; it also prevents brokers from disclosing confidential information to unauthorised third parties.

A term and termination clause defines the duration of the agreement and how it may be brought to an end, including notice requirements and termination. It should also deal with outstanding commission and whether post-termination fees are payable for work done during the term.

Liabilities, indemnities, and insurance clauses should also be included to protect a party from another party’s actions. This clause allocates risk through limits on liability, regulatory breaches, exclusions for indirect loss, and indemnities for misrepresentation.

Lastly, a governing law and jurisdiction clause must be included alongside structured dispute resolution. This explains the process for resolving disputes between the parties, including escalation to senior management or mediation prior to legal action.

At Nath Solicitors, we provide expert advice on broker agreements. If you need assistance, please call us on 0203 983 8278 or email us at enquiries@nathsolicitors.co.uk.

The post Key Clauses Every Broker Agreement Should Include appeared first on Defamation & Commercial Litigation Lawyers London | Nath Solicitors.

Firstly, litigation involves a time cost which is shared throughout a business. The lengthy process of preparing for litigation, including document disclosure, litigation meetings, and witness statement preparation, can adversely affect senior decision makers. Sometimes, the lost opportunities from running the business and managing teams can equal or surpass the legal expenses involved in pursuing the claim.

Secondly, disputes create internal strain and disruption within the business, including:

• Interfering with everyday workflows
• Halting routine deletion of documentation and data, and staff may be required to collect communications from shared drives.
• In regulated sectors, compliance and risk teams are often brought into the process where additional review stages are introduced.

The wider effect of additional burdens on an organisation can lead to it becoming more cautious by slowing down decisions, and teams hesitant to take reasonable commercial risks for fear of how the contents of a document or correspondence might look in court.

Thirdly, litigation affects cash flow and financial planning. A case that looks manageable on paper can inevitably become costly because of disbursements and expenses during proceedings such as interim applications, disclosure, witness evidence, expert reports or trial preparation. Businesses may need to set aside reserves for adverse costs exposure, security for costs paid into court, or potential damages, which can limit investment elsewhere. Insurance or litigation funding can ease immediate pressure, but have their own added costs, such as premiums and success fees.

Reputational and relationship damage can emerge in litigation. Public disputes unsettle customers, investors, suppliers, and employees, especially when allegations hinge on integrity, competence, or payment practices. Disputes can strain commercial relationships even if the proceedings are not high profile, and counterparties can become less willing to negotiate, renew contracts, or collaborate in future ventures. In some sectors, litigation can prompt audits or heighten scrutiny from partners.

Ultimately, litigation carries an element of uncertainty in every case, even those with strong prospects. Outcomes can be decided by credibility, unexpected issues from disclosure, or judicial discretion, and can distort commercial decision-making, leading parties to settle too early out of caution or to continue because of sunk costs and emotion.

To make sound decisions about business dispute strategies and shield the business’s commercial interests, it is beneficial to understand all the associated costs of proceedings, not merely the legal ones. When litigation is unavoidable, tight case management, realistic budgeting, and disciplined decision making can limit hidden costs.

Nath Solicitors are a leading boutique law firm with over 30 years’ legal experience. We provide expert advice on litigation. If you need assistance, please call us on 0203 983 8278 or email us at enquiries@nathsolicitors.co.uk.

The post The Real Costs Of Commercial Litigation: Beyond Legal Fees appeared first on Defamation & Commercial Litigation Lawyers London | Nath Solicitors.

A key starting point is to consider whether the parties are willing to engage. Mediation is of most use when all parties cooperate with a shared intention to resolve matters and participate in discussions directly or through representation. Even with strained relationships, parties can still achieve success through safe communication.

What type of dispute is suitable for mediation?

Mediation is suited to a wide range of disputes such as (but not limited to):

• Professional negligence
• Breach of contract
• Money claims
• Bankruptcy
• Insolvency
• Intellectual property
• Defamation

When is mediation not suitable?

Mediation is unsuitable when one party is unable to negotiate freely because of accusations of violence and intimidation. Prior to mediation taking place, the mediator will usually screen for such safeguarding issues to ensure there is a safe environment for everyone to communicate and have their views heard. If violence or intimidation is present, courts are the recommended route to take.

Mediation is not appropriate if there is a major imbalance of power between the parties. Mediators frequently implement measures to ensure fairness when a party withholds crucial documents, employing protections like involving legal advisers or establishing disclosure procedures and organised meeting plans. Where power imbalances cannot be managed, another method of resolution should be considered.

Does the nature of the dispute influence mediation?

The nature of a dispute greatly influences the use of mediation. Where there is scope for compromise, ongoing relationships and creative solutions in family arrangements, contract disagreements and business partnerships, mediation is often the best route. It is less appropriate when a binding legal precedent is needed or one party wants public judgment.

Is a decision made at mediation legally binding?

A decision reached through mediation is not automatically legally binding simply because it arises from the mediation process itself. The legal status of any outcome depends on how the agreement is recorded and formalised. If the parties reach an agreement during mediation and then record the terms in a written settlement agreement which is signed by all parties, that document will generally be treated under UK contract law as a legally binding contract, provided the usual elements of a contract are present. In many civil or commercial disputes, mediation ends with a settlement agreement or compromise agreement, and once it is signed it can be enforced in the same way as any other contract.

In many disputes, the mediation simply results in a written settlement agreement. Provided the document is properly drafted and signed, it will generally be enforceable as a contract without any need for court involvement. If one party later fails to comply with the agreement, the other party may bring a breach of contract claim in the usual way.

At Nath Solicitors, we give expert advice on mediation. If you need assistance, please call us today on 0203 983 8278 or email us at enquiries@nathsolicitors.co.uk.

The post How Do You Assess Whether Mediation Is Appropriate? appeared first on Defamation & Commercial Litigation Lawyers London | Nath Solicitors.

At the core, the pre-action protocol aims to ensure that going to court is the last resort. To commence legal proceedings, the claimant is required to provide a letter before action or letter of claim, specifying the legal justification, a summary of essential facts, the sought-after remedy, and key documents. The letter should also give the other side a reasonable opportunity to understand the case against them and respond accordingly.

The defendant is expected to provide a timely letter of response that states whether the claim is accepted or disputed, and if disputed provide their reason. It is important for the letter to respond to the claimant’s allegations and attach supporting documentation. In addition, the parties are encouraged to engage in settlement discussions or alternative dispute resolution.

A significant part of the pre-action stage is early disclosure and information exchange. This is intended to help both parties access the strengths and weaknesses of their positions. If the dispute cannot be resolved, the pre-action correspondence is useful in identifying what is in dispute, which may in reduce time and cost later.

Importantly, if a party does not engage with pre-action compliance, unreasonably withholds information or rushes to issue proceedings without good reason, the court can impose costs sanctions. Conversely, constructive pre-action conduct can put a party in a stronger position when proceedings start.

Overall, pre-action protocols are structured towards litigation and minimising or resolving outstanding issues before issuing a claim. The objective is to promote fairness, proportionality, and early resolution to help parties avoid unnecessary court proceedings where a negotiated outcome is achievable.

Nath Solicitors has over 30 years’ legal experience and delivers practical advice on litigation matters. If you need assistance, please call us on 0203 983 8278 or email us at enquiries@nathsolicitors.co.uk.

The post Pre-Action Protocol: What It Means Before Starting A Case appeared first on Defamation & Commercial Litigation Lawyers London | Nath Solicitors.

How is the strength of a case assessed?

To access the strength of your case, it needs to satisfy legal tests to qualify as a recognised claim. For example, a contract case requires evidence of formation, agreed terms, breach of terms, and a quantifiable loss. Simplicity of explanation and methodical proof are hallmarks of a strong case.

Evidence is also an essential factor in determining the strength of a case. Factual documents such as contracts, emails, and invoices commonly help determine the outcome of a case. Witness accounts are helpful however, as this evidence is based on memory it is more vulnerable to challenge and reconstruction. Claimants face the risk that a judge, solely examining evidence, might not arrive at the same conclusion if it hinges on assumptions about implied statements or awareness.

The courts compensate proven loss, so it is essential that you can quantify your loss and support this with evidence. Conversely, if a case is legally solid but the remedy is commercially weak, a trial becomes excessively costly. Considering procedure and cost from the outset is important, as time limits can destroy a good claim or pre-action steps which are mishandled can increase the risk of costs.

Evaluating recoverability and settlement arrangements should be assessed as bringing a judgment against an insolvent opponent is of little value. Because this poses a big risk on the viability of a claim, it is important to check solvency, insurance, assets, and enforcement options before any action takes place. Risk shifts as evidence emerges, and many disputes settle after disclosure clarifies the true strengths and weaknesses of a case. A practical indicator for a strong case is when the merits, evidence, value, and cost risk align; putting you in a firm litigation position. If this is not the case, risk should be managed, via other methods such as negotiation or alternative dispute resolution.

Nath Solicitors are a boutique law firm with over 30 years’ legal experience. We provide expert advice on litigation matters. If you need assistance, please call us on 0203 983 8278 or email us at enquiries@nathsolicitors.co.uk.

The post How Strong Is Your Case: Assessing Litigation Risk appeared first on Defamation & Commercial Litigation Lawyers London | Nath Solicitors.

The allocation of legal costs is significantly affected by jurisdictional rules. The standard practice in England and Wales is for the losing party to cover a substantial amount of the winning party’s legal costs, following a court assessment. Courts use discretion and may adjust cost awards based on conduct, proportionality, and settlement behaviour. This is achieved through procedural frameworks.

In addition to lawyer fees, litigation costs may include court filing fees, expert witness fees, document production expenses, and costs associated with discovery. Courts can direct interim or security for costs payments when they believe a party may not be able to meet an adverse costs order.

Early case evaluation is key to lowering litigation risk because it encourages parties to assess the legal merits of their case, the strength of their evidence, and financial exposure before starting proceedings. Critical to risk reduction are evidence preservation, clear record keeping, and sound financial projections.

Compared to litigation, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods such as, mediation and arbitration substantially decrease both costs and time. In many jurisdictions, courts encourage parties to attend ADR meetings and may impose cost consequences on parties who unreasonably refuse to engage in settlement discussions.

Managing contractual risk is just as vital for risk reduction. Clarifying financial exposure ahead of time involves drafting exact clauses for dispute resolution, cost allocation, and liability limitations. Financial impact can be further reduced by insurance products such as legal expenses insurance or directors’ and officers’ coverage.

The importance of litigation strategy cannot be overstated, as lack of proper case management tends to escalate costs. Strategic planning, early resolution efforts, and sound contractual drafting remain the most effective tools for reducing legal cost risk.

Nath Solicitors are a leading boutique law firm in Mayfair with over 30 years’ legal experience. We give expert advice on litigation matters. If you need assistance, please call us on 0203 983 8278 or email us at enquiries@nathsolicitors.co.uk.

The post Costs In Litigation: Who Pays And How To Reduce Risk appeared first on Defamation & Commercial Litigation Lawyers London | Nath Solicitors.